🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions regarding that comments made by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, Fowler is American – and sports frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of letdown was appropriate. Instead, Fowler invoked the continued drought of US male players at the majors: none of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all love a narrative, myself included. But really. Suppose the American defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a tired Serbian in the next round). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best competitors in the world back-to-back. Fritz is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the world starting the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and concussive power on both forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of most rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few seasons has seen the curious rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter men. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite harsh limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a several dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could Fowler thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing drought of American men winning grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only felt tenuous for moments towards the very end, when the American had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz creating numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and forced him to expend far too much energy to win it. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He extended the match twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially seem like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating Fritz to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, exceeding almost everyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for America not spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz told a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {