🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.