🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Substantial Sum in Compensation against Clearing House over Seized Assets Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move represents a clear response by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize frozen Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine. The Substantial Demand According to accounts in local state media, the central bank filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim. EU leaders are set to determine later this week regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic needs. Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves. Dispute on Ownership European Union authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine. The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal measures, such as confiscating European corporate assets within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal. Geopolitical Maneuvering In comments seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a severe assault on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States." Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has previously stated it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions. Enforcement Challenges While courts in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant assets can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm. EU Countermeasures EU officials indicated they are developing measures to deter other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected. Ukraine would only be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict. Alternative Proposals The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different method for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget. Such a proposal, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition. Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful message that if you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."